Add an lightweight Review Board displayed as a web page at server.
As a development manager I need to track many projects and I don't want to run Visual Studio for every of them just to watch is there any update.
Or any other way of notification/summary information distributed by other means than Visual Studio.
Thanks

Provide the following integration points with JIRA:
- Associate code reviews with JIRA issues (e.g. review for a feature)
- Turn comments into issues (defects)

If someone submits a review that includes several revisions spanning a period of time, there's no way to determine what changes were made by the author. The only options (Compare Base and Last Revisions, etc) deal with the Base and Last Revisions. Effectively, this includes any changes made by anyone in-between, not just the author.

Pre-commit review is must to have for all type of version controls with diff/patch files or directly by uploading different version of files otherwise its going to be behind the other review tools in making of choice.

I'd love the ability to categorise a comment. Example categories might be coding standard, implementation, functionality. You could then report on these. E.g. Developer A received 20 comments last week, 90% of them were about coding standards. It will help to identify patterns in developers weak and strong points.

It would be good if the code review could log back to the original work item that a code review has taken place. When doing a review, it shows me the Work Items attached to the changeset (this is nice). However, when the review is done (accepted or rejected), there is no log in the Work Item that the review took place.

This has currently got to be done manually, would be great to get this full link.

Is there any way to link it or log something in the history of the work item(s)?

Provide more possibilities to search, filter and order the comments.
e.g. for the reviewer's name, file name, ...

By default, Review Assistant launches the 'Compare Base and Last Revisions' command when you perform a comparison. Add the option to choose a default comparison action. E.g. during comparison, authors usually use 'Compare Base Revision with Working Copy' to be able to add changes to the working copy file.

As a server admin I should be able to control whether my clients get upgrade notices, esp. for breaking changes where both client and server need to be upgraded together. At my company dozens of people have asked why they even get prompted for the 3.x version when the server is still on 2.x. Many companies have change control policies or software packaging regimes which prevent quick software upgrades. The ability to specify at the server that you want to suppress upgrade notices would make the job of administrator easier.

As Slack is getting more and more popular, integration with ReviewAssistant would be really useful.

All email notifications could be sent to Slack too.

Currently the Code Coverage report shows only TFS Changeset revisions and their status. It would be helpful if we can see even Shelveset revisions and their status. Teams who rely on pre-commit reviews use only Shelvesets and hence it's not of any use if they can see only Changesets in the Code Coverage report.

To have Due Date associated with code review and let code reviewers know that due date is coming up via email will be great functionality to have.

Basically - coder should be able to add a date for code review deadline and reviewer should get ample notification if code review is not completed within that due date.

Add integration with avatar service - gravatar. It will make easy user identification for Code Review participants. This is implemented in Crucible product for example.

Definitly needs groups when you don't know or want to assign the review to a specific person.

As a reviewer of Git code who doesn’t have the author’s repo locally, I want a better experience reviewing Git code seamlessly without pulling changes to the Git repo manually, so that I can review code quickly and without hassle.