Skip to content

Settings and activity

5 results found

  1. 19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tristan Grimmer supported this idea  · 
  2. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tristan Grimmer supported this idea  · 
  3. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tristan Grimmer supported this idea  · 
  4. 19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Code Compare  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tristan Grimmer commented  · 

    Something like this could deal with all the other 'ignore comments / version text etc' requests.

    Tristan Grimmer supported this idea  · 
  5. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  5 comments  ·  Code Compare  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tristan Grimmer commented  · 

    All three should be editable... sometimes you want to merge 2 files into the base... sometimes during an integration you may want to 'merge a diff' from one codeline into another. In short, there are some real-world situations where I wouldn't want my tool restricting me. Let perforce / scm decide what files are read-only. The question then becomes how will you deal with the RO attribute. The answer should be a choice between a) allow editing in memory and ask when saving what to do (overwrite/cancel) (that's how I have my VS set) or b) Ask what do do on first edit. Visual Studio puts a little lock symbol by the filename. Please don't restrict editing ability based on the arbitrary 'slot' a file is loaded into!